User Tools

    To create and edit articles, please register and log-in

Main Menu : categories & index etc.

Main menu
Click categories to expand


A-Z listingplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigA-Z listing

This is an alphabetical index of all content pages.


Other categories

Utilities

Contact
Register
Sandbox

Also see

Importance Ratings
News
Legal
Donate/Sponsor
Curator's rationale
AI Policy



Twitter feed 𝕏



Feeds + s.e.o. etc.
rss / xml feed
sitemap file
A-Z listing (archived)


Indexed under : Physics / Quantum Physics

Wikenigma - an Encyclopedia of Unknowns Wikenigma - an Encyclopedia of the Unknown

Electron / Quark charge balance

It's known that all atoms are based on a structure where the 'negative' electric charge of the electron(s) (conventionally known as '-1') exactly balances the 'positive' charge of the corresponding proton(s) in the atom's nucleus. [ see notes below ]

The proton's electric charge comes from the quarksplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigQuarks

Following theoretical calculations, particle accelerator experiments in the 1970s confirmed that quarks are responsible for the internal structure of protons and neutrons. ( 3 quarks each, in different configurations, see :Electron / Quark charge balance).

Agai…
from which it's built. Protons are composed of two up quarks, each with a 'fractional' charge of +⅔ , and one down quark with a charge of −1⁄3 , Thus giving a total charge of exactly +1.

This means that all non-ionised atoms (i.e. ones having the 'correct' number of electrons) have absolutely no overall electrical charge.

There is currently no explanation as to why the charge-balances exactly cancel. Which is especially enigmatic given that electrons and quarks are known to be very radically different particles.

If the charge-balances didn't cancel exactly, the universe as we currently understand it would not be viable.

Notes:

[1] It's not known how closely the charges match. But no discrepancy of any kind has ever been measured. And for the Standard Model to remain intact, it's calculated that accuracy of the match must reach at least 22 decimal places (roughly one part in 10 billion trillion).

[2] Most nuclear physicists currently assume that electrons and quarks are not built from sub-components. As yet, there has never been any experimental evidence to suggest that they might be.

[3] Since the discovery of the quark's 'fractional' charges, the question arises as to whether a better convention might be to say that the electron has a charge of 3 , the up quarks each +2 , the down quarks -1.

Editor's note :
The Standard Model has no explanation for the exact charge balance, and Wikenigma has so far been unable to source any peer-reviewed scientific literature which tackles the question. Although Wikenigma policy is to always require and include links to academic references, it's overlooked in this instance, given the crucial importance of the subject.

Importance Rating


    Please share this page to help promote Wikenigma !

Dear reader : Do you have any suggestions for the site's content?

Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for older ones, are always welcome.

If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !


Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.

( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)

Automatic Translation

You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma

Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.

Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.

Show another (random) article

Further resources :

DOKUWIKI IMPLEMENTATION DESIGN BY UNIV.ORG.UK DECEMBER 2023