User Tools

    To create and edit articles, please register and log-in

Main Menu : categories & index etc.

Main menu
Click categories to expand


A-Z listingplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigA-Z listing

This is an alphabetical index of all content pages.


Other categories

Utilities

Contact
Register
Sandbox

Also see

Importance Ratings
News
Legal
Donate/Sponsor
Curator's rationale
AI Policy



Twitter feed ð•



Feeds + s.e.o. etc.
rss / xml feed
sitemap file
A-Z listing (archived)


Indexed under : Physics / Cosmology

Wikenigma - an Encyclopedia of Unknowns Wikenigma - an Encyclopedia of the Unknown

Redshift quantisation

'Cosmological Redshift' (with regard to cosmological luminous objects such as galaxies, quasars etc) refers to the observed lowering of spectral frequencies caused by the high speed motion of astronomical objects away from an observer.

Now routinely measured, it's taken to mean that all objects in the universe are moving away from each other. That's to say the universe is expanding in all directions (currently thought to be due to the effects ofDark Energyplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigDark Energy

"The observational results of the latest 15 to 20 years have established a standard model for the cosmology which has some amazing consequences. A mysterious entity, the dark energy, has been confirmed as the dominant component of the Universe, and is also…
).

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, as the list of discovered red-shifted objects grew, it was noticed that the degree of red-shifting sometimes appeared to be 'quantised' (i.e. having 'bunched-up' values rather than a smooth distribution) - with the implication that the velocities at which objects recede tends to be grouped around certain speeds. (example)

Since then, some data compilations appear to confirm that the effect is real - while other surveys imply that there is no such effect.

If the effect is real (and not simply due to errors in measurement) there is currently no explanation for its existence.

If it's not real, there is also no explanation regarding how errors in measurement ('artefacts') consistently appear to show the quantised variations.

Further reading Phys.Part.Nucl.Lett.4:5-10,2007

Importance Rating


    Please share this page to help promote Wikenigma !

Dear reader : Do you have any suggestions for the site's content?

Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for older ones, are always welcome.

If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !


Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.

( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)

Automatic Translation

You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma

Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.

Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.

Show another (random) article

Further resources :

DOKUWIKI IMPLEMENTATION DESIGN BY UNIV.ORG.UK DECEMBER 2023