Please register ( or log-in ) to create and edit pages

User Tools

    Please register ( or log-in ) to create and edit pages
  • Register

Site Tools


Main Menu

Main menu
[ Click categories to expand ]

Other categories

For tests only


Also see:

Content Guidelinesplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigContent guidelines

Ideas for new topics are always welcomed, from experts and non-experts alike - if you're not sure if they'll be accepted by other editors, put them in the 'Proposed content' section for approval. The easiest way to create a new page is to use the

Registrationplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigRegistration

At present, only registered users can create and edit articles. The registration process is very straightforward. Just click the 'Register' link at the top right of any page.

After you've registered, you'll be able to login with your password at any time…

How to edit pagesplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigEditing pages

Once you're logged in, a grey floating 'Tool' menu at the right hand side of the screen enables access to all the main 'Content Pages' for editing. (Note: Some pages, such as the site info etc. are locked)

Like most Wikis, the site doesn't use

Importance Ratingsplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigImportance ratings

In a departure from the usual Wiki format, Wikenigma assigns 'Importance Ratings' to some pages.

The idea is to separate articles which are considered (by the editors) to cover exceptionally important unknown issues from those which (although also u…

Faqplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigFrequently Asked Questions

Q. Why the weird syntax? A. Like most Wikis, the site doesn't use HTML for formatting (security reasons etc). A guide to the special syntax can be found here. Unfortunately it can be quite confusing at first - but there's now a new 'Visual …

Newsplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigNews

[ newest at the top ]

• Oct 2020 : A milestone of 500 unknown articles has been reached.

• Aug 2020 : Currently (beta) testing the new 'WYSIWYG' (What You See Is What You Get) page editor. It greatly simplifies the editing process, avoiding the need to learn th…

Contactsplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigContacts

Use this form to send a message to Wikenigma . . . [ * note: all fields must be completed ]

Legalplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigLegal

Content in general

Please note that in common with other publicly editable wikis, this website is not responsible for content posted by the public. Nevertheless, the ongoing editing process should be able to remove unsuitable content in a reasonable time. If you…


538 unknowns listed

Wikenigma supports:

plugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigDonate to Wikenigma . . .

The best way to donate is by adding new original content !

That can either be by contributing to an existing article, or by creating a new page with an as-yet-unlisted 'Known Unknown'.

Any registered user can create content.

A-Z listing
rss / xml feed
sitemap file

Wikenigma - an Encyclopaedia of Unknowns Wikenigma - an Encyclopaedia of the Unknown Science

Cosmological Constant Problem

The cosmological constant problem is the disagreement in 'measured' values of the cosmological constant and theoretical calculations of its value. The cosmological constant was first proposed by Einstein as a mathematical necessity to rationalise how the universe has resisted collapsing under its own gravity. General relativity, however, predicts the vacuum energy density to be very different to its measured value (i.e. as needed to explain the measured expansion of the universe). There is no generally accepted explanation for this discrepancy, although numerous papers have been written about it.

“Quantum mechanics suggests the vacuum itself should fluctuate imperceptibly. In general relativity, those tiny quantum fluctuations produce an energy that would serve as the cosmological constant. Yet, it should be 120 orders of magnitude too big—big enough to obliterate the universe.”

It was examined in a 1994 paper for the American Journal of Physics (Volume 63, Issue 7) by Ronald J. Adler, Brendan Casey, and Ovid C. Jacob, who called it the 'Vacuum Catastrophe'. The paper described the spectacularly conflicting results of calculations of the energy density of a vacuum and actual 'measured' values.

“When summed up over all modes to some reasonable maximum this leads to an enormous energy density of the vacuum. Such an energy density presents serious problems when gravity is considered, since its gravitational field has not been observed; indeed the non-observation places an upper limit on the energy of the vacuum, which is in extreme conflict with the theoretical estimate: about 120 orders of magnitude!”

See: Vacuum catastrophe: An elementary exposition of the cosmological constant problem

Further reading : A 2107 article from Science linking the Cosmological Constant problem to Dark Energy

Importance Rating


    Share this page :


DOKUWIKI IMPLEMENTATION DESIGN BY UNIV.ORG.UK