Please register and log-in to create and edit pages

User Tools

    Please register and log-in to create and edit pages

Site Tools

Main Menu

Main menu
Click categories to expand

A-Z listingplugin-autotooltip__plain plugin-autotooltip_bigA-Z listing

This is an alphabetical index of all content pages.

Other categories



Also see

Importance Ratings

Wikenigma supports:

Feeds etc
rss / xml feed
sitemap file
A-Z listing (archived)

Auto-Translate Site

Wikenigma - an Encyclopedia of Unknowns Wikenigma - an Encyclopedia of the Unknown

Is the Universe a Computer Simulation?

The simulation hypothesis was first published by Hans Moravec (of the Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, US) in 1998. See Simulation, Consciousness, Existence

Then, in 2003, Professor Nick Bostrom, Director of the Future of Humanity Institute, Faculty of Philosophy & James Martin 21st Century School, Oxford University, published his paper 'Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?' (Philosophical Quarterly, 2003, Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243-255.)

“This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a 'posthuman' stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation.”

The paper has since generated much philosophical debate - according to some philosophers, it's impossible to construct a proof or disproof. More info. here on the professor's website.

Further discussion from professor Yuval Noah Harari writing in 'Homo Deus - A Brief History of Tomorrow' (Penguin Books, 2016) :

“According to current scientific dogma, everything I experience is the result of electrical activity in my brain, and therefore it should be theoretically feasible to simulate an entire world that I could not possibly distinguish from the 'real' world. Some brain scientists believe that in the not too distant future, we shall actually do such things.”

And, from a mathematical viewpoint :

“[…] since there is only one real world, whereas the number of potential virtual worlds is infinite, the probability that you inhabit the sole real world is almost zero.”

    Share this page :

Dear reader : Do you have any suggestions for the site's content?

Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for old ones, are always welcome.

If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !

Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.

( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)

Automatic Translation

You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma

Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.

Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.

Show another (random) page