Philosophers have been puzzling over the 'Brain in a Vat' problem for several decades. The 'problem' comes down to arguments over whether it's possible (or not) to philosophically 'prove' that one (i.e. the observer) is not simply an isolated brain that is, in effect, imagining the entire world around it.
There have been many treatises written about the problem. Some insisting that one could, theoretically, be able to work out if one was simply a brain in a vat - and others which maintain the opposite.
Here are some example papers :
Do You Know That You Are Not a Brain in a Vat? Logos & Episteme, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 161-181
How Both You and the Brain in a Vat Can Know Whether or Not You Are Envatted Aristotelian Society Supplementary, Volume 92, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 151–181
How I Know I’m Not a Brain in a Vat Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, Volume 64
Serious theories and skeptical theories: Why you are probably not a brain in a vat Philosophical Studies, volume 173, pages1031–1052(2016)
Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for old ones, are always welcome.
If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !
Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.
( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)
You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma
Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.
Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.