When packing convex identical 3-dimensional objects into a defined space, is a sphere the most 'efficient' shape when considering the amount of free space in the gaps?
According to the conjecture, the sphere is the convex solid which forces the largest fraction of space to remain empty.
Packed spheres leave around 25.95% of space unfilled - and intuitively would seem to be the most efficient shape.
To date, however, no mathematical proof has been discovered to show that the sphere is the most efficient.
See:Pessimal packing shapes arXiv, 2013, Metric Geometry.
Note: In 2-dimensional and 4-dimensional space, proofs have been provided for special shapes.
Also see :
Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for old ones, are always welcome.
If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !
Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.
( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)
You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma
Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.
Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.