There isn’t, as yet, any definition of a 'lifeform' which can withstand logical scrutiny.
Exceptions can easily be found for any definition so far presented. For example (from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language):
The property or quality that distinguishes living organisms from dead organisms and inanimate matter, manifested in functions such as metabolism, growth, reproduction, and response to stimuli or adaptation to the environment originating from within the organism.“
But there are no plausible reasons (apart from our current lack of expertise) why a synthetic system could not be built which could carry out all of the requirements above. Though many would argue that such a machine would still not be a ‘lifeform’. (see Synthetic Biology section below)
Many other definitions are circular e.g.“Life forms carry out biological processes.” or, “A biological process is a process of a living organism.” or, weaker still, “The characteristic state or condition of a living organism.”
(All definitions via Wikipedia)
A 2016 review in Acta Biotheor. 64(3):277-307. suggested a set of ten measures which, the authors propose, can define whether an entity is alive or not.
It is the regulation of networks and a hierarchy of complicated time patterns, which coordinate the multiple functions on different system levels within the organism.” [ which define a lifeform ]
Despite all modern knowledge about living organisms, it is still difficult to answer the question of what life really is. In a certain sense, life is still an enigma.“
Perhaps the strongest (tongue in cheek?) definition so far is from physicist Fritjof Capra “Anything which contains DNA and is not dead.”
Bearing in mind all of the above, a comprehensive resumé of the currently accepted requirements for an entity to be called 'alive' can be read here at Encyclopædia Britannica.
Working from the other direction, many research groups worldwide are attempting to create various forms of 'artificial' life.
So far, building a working replica - or analogue - of even the simplest possible living cell has not proved possible.
A major goal of synthetic biology is to understand the transition between non-living matter and life. The bottom-up development of an artificial cell would provide a minimal system with which to study the border between chemistry and biology. So far, a fully synthetic cell has remained elusive, but chemists are progressing towards this goal by reconstructing cellular subsystems.
See : Synthesis of lipid membranes for artificial cells Nature Reviews Chemistry (2021)
Also see :
Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for old ones, are always welcome.
If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !
Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.
( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)
You are currently viewing an auto-translated version of Wikenigma
Please be aware that no automatic translation engines are 100% accurate, and so the auto-translated content will very probably feature errors and omissions.
Nevertheless, Wikenigma hopes that the translated content will help to attract a wider global audience.