Models and estimates of Earth’s human carrying capacity vary widely and assume, rather than solve for, binding environmental constraints (the process or resource in shortest supply relative to human biological needs). The binding constraint, and therefore the true upper bound on the number of humans that Earth could sustain indefinitely, remains unknown.
Source : Humanity’s Fundamental Environmental Limits in Human Ecology volume 48, pages235–244
In 2020, a research team from St Olaf College and the University of Oregon, US, modelled two populations of interest, primary producers (plants) and humans, in a global, managed ecosystem, with 'ideal' tecnological support.
The finding was that :
With ideal technology, human carrying capacity runs into the tens of trillions, while with currently demonstrated technology Earth could support more than 200 billion humans. These numbers reflect neither a desirable nor a natural equilibrium population level, but represent a rough estimate of the maximum number of humans Earth could sustain.
As noted above, recent studies have wildly varying estimates. One from 1961 put the figure at 510 trillion.
Note: The first such estimate was made by Antony van Leeuwenhoek in 1679 - at 13.4 billion : source
Ideas for new topics, and suggested additions / corrections for old ones, are always welcome.
If you have skills or interests in a particular field, and have suggestions for Wikenigma, get in touch !
Or, if you'd like to become a regular contributor . . . request a login password. Registered users can edit the entire content of the site, and also create new pages.
( The 'Notes for contributors' section in the main menu has further information and guidelines etc.)